Michael Morgan is the Founder of Herrmann International Asia & an HBDI practitioner for over 30 years. He is the Author of Creating Work-force Innovation, turning individual creativity into organizational innovation and is a recognised expert in Creative Thinking. His specialties include: Thinking, Organizational Innovation, Individual creativity and creative thinking, Whole Brain Thinking, the application of Whole Brain Thinking to business and education.
ET: What is the Whole Brain Thinking model?
MM: Everybody thinks differently, but few organizations are able to leverage cognitive diversity as a strategic advantage.
The ways individuals think, guide how they work. The way groups of individuals think guide how the teams they form work. The way groups of teams think and work can make or break the success of the organization.
The success of an initiative depends on the ability of its management teams to drive communication, innovation, and productivity within and across functions. In 40 years of working with Fortune 100 clients, we've found that understanding and applying diversity of thought is the key to strategic success.
The Whole Brain® Model (below) is our time tested framework to decode and harness cognitive diversity of individuals, teams, and organizations.
The Herrmann Brain Dominance Instrument® (HBDI®) measures Thinking preferences against the Whole Brain® Model. The HBDI® is the world's leading Thinking Styles assessment tool. It identifies your preferred approach to emotional, analytical, structural and strategic thinking. It also provides individuals with a significantly increased level of personal understanding.
ET: How did Ned Herrmann develop the HBDI & how does it compare with other psychometric instruments?
MM: Ned Herrmann, founder of Herrmann International and originator of Whole Brain® Thinking, first pioneered the study of the brain in the field of business while in charge of Management Education at General Electric Corporation's world-class corporate university, Crotonville. He published his initial research as a two-part series in T+D Magazine in 1981-1982 (The Creative Brain, Parts I & II).
His first widely acclaimed book, 'The Creative Brain', traced the scientific and historical roots of his innovative Whole Brain® Thinking approach. In 1995, his ground-breaking 'The Whole Brain® Business Book' (McGraw Hill) created a new benchmark in thinking styles research specifically as it applies to critical business areas such as leadership, productivity, sales and teamwork.
The pioneering work, research and spirit of Ned Herrmann continue to drive the company three decades later. Ned viewed the Whole Brain® Model as a metaphor for an organizing principle of how the brain works, and as clients and practitioners around the world demonstrate every day, the exponential applications of one simple model has created a system that can improve virtually all aspects of individual and organizational performance.
There are plenty of employee assessments and online quizzes out there that will reveal what box, character, style or type you fall into. And they all aim to answer the question: Am I a 'this' or am I a 'that'?
But when it comes to the HBDI®, we talk in terms of thinking preferences. No one is strictly a 'this' or a 'that,' because everyone has access to their Whole Brain®, regardless of what your preferences are. You simply prefer (and in some cases, actively avoid) certain kinds of thinking over others.
So, what exactly do we mean by thinking preference? Well, it might be easier to start by explaining what a preference is not.
ET: How does the way we think influence the way we behave?
MM: Thinking preference doesn't equal competence.
People often assume that having a preference for analytical thinking means that they'll breeze through any kind of analytical work. Or that having a preference for relational thinking means you'll be great at working with others.
But having a preference for a certain way of thinking doesn't necessarily mean you're great at all the things associated with it. And by the same token, not having a preference for something doesn't necessarily mean you can't be good at it.
To understand why, just think about a task you don't like doing - a specific aspect of your job, cleaning the house, managing your personal finances. Maybe you even hate doing it. But out of necessity, you've become competent at it.
Plenty of people are highly competent in jobs they really don't like. You might be pretty good at organizing all the logistics of your holiday, not because you like or want to do it, but because you know it has to be done. The task requires a lot of effort, but the prospect of a fun trip motivates you to do it.
On the flipside, plenty of people love to do things that they're not so great at. A lot of tone-deaf people like to sing, but I'm sure a whole lot of people wished they wouldn't.
In the same way, your thinking preferences are simply a reflection of the kind of thinking you're naturally drawn to, not the thinking you're necessarily good at. When you're 'not thinking' about it, it's the thinking you default to.
Here's another reason why it's an oversimplification to say you're a 'this' or 'that' thinker: only 5% of the population in our database of millions of HBDI profiles has a single strong preference.
Most people (92% of our database) have two or three preferences, and even within a single quadrant, differing degrees of preference for that kind of thinking will show up in different ways. Only 3% have a balance of preferences for thinking across all four quadrants.
At work, you can see those thinking preferences show up in the way you're energised by certain activities - the things you find so interesting and so stimulating that you'd choose to do them over any other task. They may not be the easiest for you, but they are always the most satisfying and fulfilling. You don't have to look too hard for motivation because your inner fires are already stoked.
ET: How does the Whole Brain Thinking Model support individual, team and Leadership development?
MM: Is there a one-size-fits-all approach to good leadership? What leadership style is the secret sauce to peak efficiency? It's a question we get constantly. If you have any hand in designing leadership development you've probably heard the same question time and time again.
The thing is, there isn't one. Effective leadership isn't uniform, it's personal and individual and the best leaders know this to be true. Trying to force-fit yourself, or any of your team members, into a prescribed mould is a no-win game. Good leaders understand their own style – who they are – and have learned how to leverage it.
So if there's no one type of leader you have to be, what's the key to being successful? No matter what kind of business you're in, being successful requires Whole Brain® Thinking. That same concept applies to leadership. You must understand both how you prefer to think and where your blind spots are so you can fully leverage your mental strengths and stretch outside them when necessary.
Here's the even better news: applying Whole Brain® Thinking doesn't require you to be someone you're not. After all, you have access to your whole brain, not just the thinking styles you prefer the most. Instead, this is about becoming highly skilled as a thinker, allowing yourself to situationally access the different thinking required to handle a given challenge.
This is the essence of leadership agility, particularly in today's knowledge intensive world where challenges are more complex. We must take full advantage of our own diversity of thought as well as the thinking diversity around us.
Shifting thinking to match the needs of a situation is something anyone can learn how to do, and developing that skill should be a chief priority of every modern leadership development program.
So rather than concentrating on the most effective leadership styles, ground your leadership training and development efforts in practical ways to unleash thinking capability.
Once you open leaders up to their full thinking potential and give them experience accessing and applying their own inherent thinking diversity, all of the modes of thinking will become more available to them on a daily basis.
When we give our leaders the power to move between these thinking styles, we give them the power to be their most effective selves.
The idea isn't to change the unchangeable but to help leaders take advantage of the flexibility we all have to become more effective across the range of key leadership issues based on the situation. We know the range is big: strategic thinking, critical thinking, mindful focus, collaboration, empathy, problem solving, intuitive thinking, conceptualising, dealing with ambiguity, visualising, creative processing and more.
When we give our leaders the power to move between these thinking styles, we give them the power to be their most effective selves.
ET: How would the WBT model help us manage the uncertainty and live with ambiguity.
MM: In times of uncertainty and ambiguity, we can use the lens of Whole Brain® Thinking to flex our thinking and see things from perspectives we perhaps wouldn't have otherwise.
What is most important is to make sure that your current approach is working for you in the given situation. If not, shifting your thinking can help manage the uncertainty and live with ambiguity.
By understanding our thinking preferences and those of others, we are able to make better sense of situations and progress more quickly towards desired outcomes.
To thrive in the next normal, you may consider who you work with, and work with those who perhaps you may not have initially gravitated towards. Generally speaking, we're more likely to (on first instinct) want to collaborate with those who think similarly to us.
But, while this can be advantageous in some settings or situations, to help manage the uncertainty and live with ambiguity we need to get out of our comfort zone.
The four preferences that everyone has access to all pertain to certain strengths when it comes to work. We can all perform in different roles, even if the role is not a perfect fit with our preferences. Being aware of when we are mentally stretching can help us understand why certain tasks make us feel more fatigued or drained – and it also may help us to know where to get help from for particular tasks.
Using the lens of Whole Brain® Thinking is the perfect way to do this. It is also the secret to adopting an agile and resilient mindset.
Adopting an agile and resilient mindset is easier said than done. But, as with all things in life, growth comes with practice. You can find ways to practice shifting to another quadrant while you're engaged in a challenging activity at work, or at home. By 'stepping into' the thinking style of one of your less-dominant quadrants, you can feel a 'mental stretch'.
You can thrive in the next normal by not only understanding how to get the best from your own thinking, but from understanding how others think and how to engage the right people – we're at our best when we know where to get support.
back to top ^
|